In online learning environments, it is critical for instructors to focus on increasing interactions between students and provide guidance in navigating resources and evaluating information. Siemens (2008) supports this view, explaining how “educators must assume dual roles: as experts with advanced knowledge of a domain and guides who foster and encourage learner exploration” (p. 17). He also explains how teachers act as the curator to provide learning resources for students to access the content and concepts necessary for their field. YouTube and podcasts are valuable ways to deliver information through video and audio. Programs such as Moodle, WebCT, and SoftChalk create online learning environments where educators can modify instructional tools within their course, as well as encourage students to communicate and collaborate.
It is important for students to learn to work individually and in groups through online courses. Durrington, Berryhill, and Swafford (2006) believe that, “to encourage high student interactivity in an online setting, the learning environment must be supportive, open, and respectful” (p. 191). Blogs, wikis, and Google Docs are tools that I have personally used for collaborating within my Walden courses. Blogs are a great way for students to share their ideas and receive feedback and opinions from peers and instructors. Wikis and Google Docs provide a great format for sharing resources and work, as well as promoting collaboration, with the added feature of others being able to modify the information. Project2Manage is a new tool meant for project management and collaboration, allowing students to share their work and future goals. Twiddla is also a technology tool I am researching more about, and it works as a whiteboard for online collaboration. Here students can browse, edit, share, and chat within groups.
In order for students to collaborate, there must be clear communication amongst the individuals working together, as well as individual communication with the instructor. With the advancements of the internet, there are multiple ways to send a single message. Durrington, Berryhill, and Swafford (2006) explain how, “even a private e-mail…builds a nurturing environment that encourages future participation and enhances the quality and depth of overall discussion” (p. 191). Instructors providing students with feedback and guidance will provide encouragement and remind students that their work and opinions are valued, which is not often seen in face to face classrooms. Facebook, Twitter, Skype, and instant messaging tools are all technology tools that students and instructors can use for effective communication anytime, resulting in successful collaboration and online learning.
This blog provides more information about the values of virtual classrooms versus traditional face to face classrooms. It examines collaboration in learning and the teaching methods used in both learning environments.
This blog explains how social networking tools such as YouTube, Google Docs, Facebook, and Twitter can also be used to support collaboration in online learning and the business world.
References
Bannerjee, G. (2011). Traditional and virtual classrooms- what’s the difference? Retrieved from http://www.wiziq.com/blog/traditional-and-virtual-classrooms/
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190−193. Academic Search Premier database; Accession Number: 19754742
Hart, J. (2011). Do you really need separate social learning tools? Part two- 6 ways to integrate learning into the workflow. Retrieved from http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/blog/2011/10/25/do-you-really-need-separate-social-learning-tools-part-2-6-ways-to-integrate-learning-into-working/
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITForum.